WebIf harm is not reasonably foreseeable, no liability Doughty –v- Turner Manufacturing Co. Ltd (1964) But the extent of the harm, and the way in which the harm arises, need not be reasonably foreseeable, as long as the type of harm is reasonably foreseeable Bradford –v- Robinson Rentals (1967) WebThis can be seen in Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co. Ltd [1964] 1 QB 518. The claimant, an employee of the defendants, was injured when the cover from a vat of molten metal was tipped into the vat itself. This caused a chain reaction, resulting in an explosion which seriously burned the claimant. The courts held that whilst a splash burn from ...

Remoteness of Damages in Light of Tort - Black n

WebDoughty v Turner Manufacturing Company Ltd Judgment The Law Reports Weekly Law Reports Cited authorities 6 Cited in 47 Precedent Map Related Vincent Categories … WebJun 8, 2024 · The cover on a cauldron of exceedingly hot molten sodium cyanide was accidentally knocked into the cauldron and the plaintiff was damaged by the resultant … small parchment or wax paper sacks for food

[Case Law Tort] [

WebCURT OF APPEAL DOUGHTY v TURNER MANUFACTURING COMPANY [1964] 1 All ER 98 29 November 1963 Full text The facts of this. case are not particularly relevant. Essentially, the plaintiff workman was injured by molten liquid at the factory where he worked and sued for damages i.e. a sum of money. The injury that he sustained were … http://www.pelosolaw.com/casebriefs/torts/doughty.html WebJun 14, 2024 · Doughty v Turner Manufacturing. Example case summary. Last modified: 14th Jun 2024. The claimant, Doughty, was an employee of the defendants, Turner Manufacturing Company, where he worked in their factory.... small parks with few species are known as